Detail of Preah Vihear on Wikipedia

Preah Vihear is a Khmer temple situated atop a 525-meter cliff in the Dângrêk Mountains in Cambodia and on the border of Sisaket Province, in the Northeastern Thailand. There was a serious conflict between Thailand and Cambodia of which country is was located in 1962, leading it to the International Court of Justice. The words have been made that all of the antiques and the castle belongs to Cambodia, but the outside areas are still in Thailand's protection. Affording a view for many kilometers across a plain, it has the most spectacular setting of all the temples built during the six-century-long Khmer Empire. As a key edifice of the empire's spiritual life, it was supported and modified by successive kings and so bears elements of several architectural styles. Preah Vihear is unusual among Khmer temples in being constructed along a long north-south axis, rather than having the conventional rectangular plan with orientation toward the east. The temple gives its name to Cambodia's Preah Vihear province, in which is is located, as well as the Khao Phra Wihan National Park in Sisaket Province, Thailand, through which the temple is most easily accessible.

Ancient History

Construction of the first temple on the site began in the early 9th century; both then and in the following centuries it was dedicated to the Hindu god Shiva in his manifestations as the mountain gods Sikharesvara and Bhadresvara. The earliest surviving parts of the temple, however, date from the Koh Ker period in the early 10th century, when the empire's capital was at the city of that name. Today, elements of the Banteay Srei style of the late 10th century can be seen, but most of the temple was constructed during the reigns of the kings Suryavarman I (1002–1050) and Suryavarman II (1113–1150). An inscription found at the temple provides a detailed account of Suryavarman II studying sacred rituals, celebrating religious festivals and making gifts, including white parasols, golden bowls and elephants, to his spiritual advisor, the aged Brahman Divakarapandita. The Brahman himself took an interest in the temple, according to the inscription, donating to it a golden statue of a dancing Shiva.

International dispute over ownership

In modern times, ownership of the temple was disputed by Thailand and Cambodia, leading to an international crisis and a decision by the International Court of Justice, commonly known as the World Court, in The Hague.

The court proceedings focused not on questions of cultural heritage or on which state was the successor to the Khmer Empire but on technicalities of border demarcation work carried out in the early 20th Century by Thailand, then called Siam, and the French colonial authorities then ruling Cambodia. In 1904, the two sides formed a joint border commission. In the vicinity of the temple, the group was tasked to work under the principal that the border would follow the watershed line of the Dângrêk mountain range. In 1907, after survey work, Siam requested that French officers draw up a map to show the border’s precise location. The resulting map, which was sent to Thai authorities, showed Preah Vihear as being on the Cambodian side.

In 1954, Thai forces occupied the temple following the withdrawal of French troops from newly independent Cambodia. Cambodia protested and in 1959 asked the World Court to rule that the temple lay in Cambodian territory. The case became a volatile political issue in both countries. Diplomatic relations were severed, and threats of force voiced by both governments.

Arguing in the Hague for Cambodia was former U.S. secretary of state Dean Acheson, while Thailand’s legal team included a former British attorney general, Sir Frank Soskice. Cambodia contended that the map showing the temple as being on Cambodian soil was the authoritative document. Thailand argued that the map was invalid, was not an official document of the border commission, and violated the commission’s working principle that the border would follow the watershed line, which would place the temple in Thailand. If Thailand had not protested the map earlier, the Thai side said, it was because Thai authorities had practical possession of the temple, due to the great difficulty of scaling the cliff from the Cambodian side, or had not understood that the map was wrong.

On June 15, 1962, the court ruled 9 to 3 that the temple belonged to Cambodia and, by a vote of 7 to 5, that Thailand must return any antiquities such as sculpture that it had removed from the temple. In its decision, the court noted that over the five decades after the map was devised, the Siamese/Thai authorities did not object in various international forums to the map’s depiction of the temple’s location. Nor did they object when a French colonial official received the Siamese scholar and government figure Prince Damrong at the temple in 1930. Thailand had accepted and benefited from other parts of the border treaty, the court ruled. With these and other acts, it said, Thailand had accepted the map and therefore Cambodia was the owner of the temple. The court declined to take up the question of whether the border as shown in the 1907 map corresponded to the watershed line.

Thailand reacted angrily. It announced it would boycott meetings of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization, with Thai officials saying this step was to protest a U.S. bias toward Cambodia in the dispute. As evidence, Thai officials cited the pro-Cambodia vote of an American judge on the court and Acheson’s role as Cambodia’s advocate; the U.S. government replied that Acheson was merely acting as a private attorney, engaged by Cambodia. Mass demonstrations were staged in Thailand protesting the ruling.

Thailand eventually backed down. In January 1963, Cambodia formally took possession of the site in a colorful ceremony attended by close to 1,000 people, many of whom had made the arduous climb up the cliff from the Cambodian side. A fit Prince Sihanouk, Cambodia’s leader, bounded up the cliff in less than an hour, paused to sip lemonade, then made offerings to Buddhist monks. In the ceremony, he made a gesture of conciliation, announcing that all Thais would be able to visit the temple without visas, and that Thailand was free to keep antiquities that it had taken away from the site.

However, Thailand and Cambodia agreed to separate Prasat Preah Vihear into two sides, which are the Thai and Cambodian sides. The entrance is in Thailand, but if you enter from Cambodia you have to climb the cliff.[citation needed]

The following information was posted online by Thailand's Thai News Agency on 24 May 2008, reflecting the current status of discuss the status of the dispute between Thailand and Cambodia. "BANGKOK, May 24, 2008 (TNA) -- Cambodia has agreed to register only the ancient Preah Vihear temple ruins themselves as a UNESCO World Heritage site, leaving the surrounding area disputed by Thailand and Cambodia unresolved, and to prepare a new map showing the ruins for consideration by UNESCO and Thailand, Thai Foreign Minister Noppadon Pattama said Saturday. Mr. Noppadon, Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) officials met in Paris for 10 hours on Thursday. The Thai foreign minister told a press conference that the meeting was held in a friendly atmosphere. The Cambodian government agreed to limit its registration of the Preah Vihear temple only as a World Heritage site, and would submit new map of temple premises to the Thai government and UNESCO for consideration on June 6. Thailand supports Cambodia in registering the ancient temple ruins as a World Heritage site, Mr. Noppadon said, indicating that he would forward the outcome of the meeting to Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej and related government agencies as soon as possible . Agreements reached at the meeting were contained in a joint communiqué and must be approved first by both the Thai and Cambodian governments, he said. The revised map, prepared by the Phnom Penh government and submitted when it applied for registering Preah Vihear as a World Heritage site last year, must be studied again whether it was appropriate, said Mr. Noppadon. Thailand earlier held that the dispute over the disputed 4.6 sq. km. area adjoining the temple ruins has yet to be settled. Historically, Thailand and Cambodia have both laid claim to the temple, which sits astride the border in Thailand's Si Sa Ket, but easy access is only through Thailand. The World Court ruled in 1962 that the temple belonged to Cambodia.

Civil war and present times

Civil war began in Cambodia in 1970; the temple's location high atop a cliff served to make it readily defensible militarily. Soldiers loyal to the Lon Nol government in Phnom Penh continued to hold it long after the plain below fell to communist forces. Tourists were able to visit from the Thai side during the war. The Khmer Rouge captured Phnom Penh in April 1975, but the soldiers at Preah Vihear continued to hold out after the collapse of their government. The Khmer Rouge made several unsuccessful attempts to capture the temple, then finally succeeded on May 22, 1975 by shelling the cliff, scaling it and routing the defenders, Thai officials reported at the time. It was said to be the last place in Cambodia to fall to the Khmer Rouge.

Full-scale war began again in Cambodia in December 1978 when the Vietnamese army invaded to overthrow the Khmer Rouge. Khmer Rouge troops retreated to border areas. In January, the Vietnamese reportedly attacked Khmer Rouge troops holed up in the temple, but there were no reports of damage to it. Large numbers of Cambodian refugees entered Thailand after the invasion. In June 1979, Thai security forces forcibly expelled tens of thousands of them back into Cambodia in the vicinity of Preah Vihear. Unknown numbers were killed by landmines, gunfire and exposure; the government that Vietnam installed in Phnom Penh put the number of fatalities at more than 300.

Guerilla warfare continued in Cambodia through the 1980s and well into the 1990s, hampering access to Preah Vihear. The temple opened briefly to the public in 1992, only to be re-occupied the following year by Khmer Rouge fighters. In December 1998, the temple was the scene of negotiations by which several hundred Khmer Rouge soldiers, said to be the guerrilla movement's last significant force, agreed to surrender to the Phnom Penh government.

The temple opened again to visitors from the Thai side at the end of 1998; Cambodia completed the construction of a long-awaited access road up the cliff in 2003.

Since the Cambodian government decided to nominate the site for inclusion into the UNESCO World Heritage Site list, tensions between the two countries on this issue reignited. Thailand has stated that they do not object to the application for the temple complex, but that Cambodia also listed disputed areas around the temple when applying to put the temple on the list.

Thank to Wiki.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Our great king has done good jobs to detain Cambodian territary.

Tommy said...

I wondor why Thai is so stuborn and shameless to lie that our Preah Vihear belongs to Thailand.
Some Thai read books but act as if without reading books. I feel hopeless with Thai.

Anonymous said...

Yo. Tommy,You are going to misunderstand or pretend to miss its point. But first of all i want to ask you some questions;

- When your nation was in chaos of homocide by Khmer Rough not care about the same racial, same language, human right. Then you people never never realized which land gave and protected your people from that fear,wasn't it Thailand, Hmm?

- Why are your people gets mad about an unreasonable rumors(which i don't want to mention it), it then leading to the unacceptable action of your people to our HIGHEST. On the contrary, we will never think about it, i mean the uncivilized action, we will not and will never take account in your HIGHEST.

- Wouldn't you think, this is the political campaign for the upcoming election? I think it is the effective way to achieve via Nationalist campaign?

I will not refuse that the most disgusting guys from Thailand espacially the ex-prime minister Shinnawatara and his gangs has the undercover agenda about the interests over Koh Kong and natural resource as gas, petroleum. This is something your people better take care. This guy will cause the diaster on the public interests, he and his gangs will sucking your richness and returning you nothing but poverty.

We,Cambodia and Thailand, both want to live in peace and share the good thing together. Please do understand more and more about the hiding purpose of a bad politicians. It's the real point.

Anonymous said...

If Thai are good they don't blind their next generation by liar history. Thai must respect its neighbor and accept the truth which is unquestionable recognized by international historians and intellectuals.We really want to live with harmony with the people who are more or less connected. We accept the past however we will not tolerate any intention of invasion or blur out our respectful bloodline.

Anonymous said...

Khmer blind. Not in the history, but now.
They have area next to each other. So, they are similar in culture. Thailand has their language and culture.

History is history. Thailand is not khmer.
I saw khmers claim Thailand's culture and the whole country as their own over the internet. It's funny!

Historical civilization is just history. All of you surely didn't build it by yourselves.

So, what are you all doing? Blind people!

Not just Thailand... Khmers claim Vietnam, and Laos too. Stubborn child...

Thomas said...

Hey anonymous!

YOU are the ignorant in this case!You should read MORE intellectual Writers.Who have REAL diplomas!

"The Khmer Kingdom" of Angkor (First Bhuddist Kingdom of the SEA Region!)of King Javayaman IV was covering Kanchanaburi,Th to most of central Viet Nam,and Laos,right down even to Indonisian Java!the Modern "Thai" language and "Laosian" are direct Decendants of The Ancient Khmer language!Like it or not !The Truth is The Truth!

Love Your Brothers and Sisters and Work together!!!One World!PEACE!!

Anonymous said...

someone,

hey thais, please we just want you to accept the truth and stop saying that you are the founder of the great civilisation of S.E.A. As per the real scholars, researchers, archeologists,... thais people is just like the Romains in Italy who imitated everything from the ancient Greece which we want to refer to the Great civilisation of Angkor. if khmer had not been in the war so long time, today all the cultural practices that thais borrowed from Angkor would be known as under khmer civilization. We agree that khmer is so poor that we just did have time to give value to our culture. I agree that preah vivhear issue is based on the question of boundary and not on history nor on the culture. Cambodian people would really be happy if thais could be less greedy and be more postive towards khmer people. many thanks

Rocky said...

Hee how are you doing brothers, I have read all of you guys comments above and it really make me want to say something a bit. I am also Cambodian. So I know how the hot issue of our Preh Vihear is. I don't feel good too when every time i read the news and i see some small group of Thai people claims about Preah Vihear temple. Until recently, the issue is getting worse. But let me break it down a little bit. Please my Cambodian brothers. Don't let the madness and hate overcome your feeling. I love my country too but think it carefully before it getting worser. Technically Preah Vihear is absolutely our 100% base on historically and fact. It is impossible that Thai can claim it as their. However, the issue is about the surrounding areas of 4.6 kilometers at the border around Preah Vihear temple. Technically, the areas is our base on 1907 map that French and Siam (Thai) government had an agreement in 1907. The problem is Thai government themselves did not know exactly of the current overlapping areas is belong to us in the map that drew by French. It does not mean that French had cheat on that map but because of Thai side did not check it properly upon the map was completely drew. In addition, Thai king event thank to the French government also. Until about 50 years later, just Thai government react to the map as a problem emerge about the current overlapping area, and it rejects the truth even the map said so. For Thai people, what i am talking above is true. You guys can go back and do the research if you want. I know that both countries do not want to loss its sovereignity, and no body want to be the loser. In fact, some Thai people even say that we Cambodian always refer to our old history and want to claim our territory. I just want to reply to them right aways, we Cambodian accept the truth. We know that our history was a Khmer empire, and we know that our culture was once a great culture in south east Asia back then which even influence to Thai culture nowadays. But we don't dream that we can reclaim our past back, and we know pretty well that the past is the past and we look forward of the future of Cambodia. In this globalization era, what we Cambodia want is peace and development, but not the ill hate disease of history. What I want to say is the border dispute area is your government fault that did not check it properly in 1907 when the map was done drawing. You can not blame Cambodia of over action about this dispute border area. Cambodia back then was weak and chaos. Instead we were repressed by the French government, in fact, French caused us losing a huge piece of land either to Vietnam back then. So just let accept the fact and accept the faults. What we are doing for right now is just to protect of what is left for us today from our history, and we are going to protect it at all cost for our nation.

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Thailand, the uneducated and nation of thievery VERSUS Cambodia, the nation of peace.
To all crazy Thais: Before you guys can claim the border temple, answer me these questions: Why do you say Preah Vihear temple belongs to Thailand? Where were the Thais 900 years ago? Who built the Preah Vihear temple, and why? If you still believe the temple belongs to Thais, what are the proof? If you can not answer all of these questions you need to go back to school and study some more. Here let me tell you a little bit about history. The current provinces and cities of Cambodia call Batdombang, Siem Reap, Preah Vihear, Srei Sophorn (later Serei Sophon or Sisophon as the Thai pronunciation of it) NEVER belong to Siam (known as Thailand since 1939). These regions have always belonged to Cambodia, but have been attacked, and at a certain times in history annexed by Thailand. Most recently , these regions were invaded and taken by Siam/Thailand in 1795 and 1941. They remained under Thai control until 1946. The first Siamese invasion and looting of Angkor was around 1352 and again in 1430s. Ayuthaya, the Siamese capitol itself was built on top of the demise of Srei Dvaravati, former kingdom of the Mon-Khmer. The provinces taken from the Khmers in 1795 were Batdombang, Siem Reap/Angkor, Bongkol-Borei, Srei Sophorn. In 1814 more provinces were annexed by Siam namely Mioy Prie, Toke Peou, Preah Vihear, and Stung Treng. Only 1907 were most of these provinces returned to Cambodia. However, other Khmer borei now called provinces or khet norkor such as Rechborie (Korat), Boriram (Buriram), Sorint(Surin), Korkan, Sisaket, Prachinburi, Chantaborie (Chantaburi), Champasak Trat etc. were annexed before 1790, and have remained under Thai occupation till today. Under the French-Thai tready executed in 1907, the Thais were required to return to Cambodia only those provinces taken by the Thais after 1790. History of Thai point of view, especially relating to Angkorian legacy, was cultivated by king Mongkut and his son, Prince Domrong Rejenubheb. The story goes on and on.... So, now you know 900 years ago there was no such thing as Thais. 900 years ago you guys never been around, and NOTHING belongs to Thai even Ayuthaya, how would you claim Preah Vihear temple? So Thais just except the facts.

sanal said...

We are Khmer we have to try hard to protect our nation. I strongly acuse The Siams that dare to do such an embarrassed action.

Please all Cambodian stand up and struggle to develop our country because the Siams look down us so we must do our best to stop them saying so.

Sanal

Anonymous said...

Thailand wants to take control of 4.6km land to cut off the entrance, so all the cambodian can NOT DRIVE VEHICLE up to the Preah Vihear Temple.As soon as they take control of that land Preah Vihear Temple is next.4.6km belongs to Cambodia .It is very important to Cambodia.It is only entrance that we can drive up there.

Anonymous said...

Thai made so much profit from Khmer Refugees. They were paid about $22 US dollars per refugee per day and they fed us with rotten fish and half a bucket of water per week.